Are ultra-processed foods still harmful? | Ultra-processed foods

Are ultra-processed foods still harmful?  |  Ultra-processed foods


I read Rachel Dixon’s piece (‘Avoid ingredients you don’t know’: 25 of the healthiest processed foods you can buy in the UK, July 31) with wry amusement, following seamlessly into irritation.

Ultra-processed foods (UPF) harm health on a massive scale. Cheap, carb- and sugar-laden, over-packaged foods are aimed at the poorest sectors of society. They can’t pay £4.50 on a fancy niçoise salad or a liter of flavored water in snazzy cans.

The Guardian doesn’t help by pointing Waitrose shoppers to expensive hummus or falafel, or expensive ice cream. That is not really addressing the diabetes crisis in disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Laurence N Mann
Twickenham, London

I feel that Rachel Dixon’s article missed an opportunity to enlighten readers about the UPF. We have been told that they pose some health risks – so what is a UPF? Is it a food made from certain ingredients, the way the food is manufactured (ie processed), or a combination of the two? I’ve never loved cooking, and with convenience foods I’m only too happy to let someone else do it, so I can enjoy the time saved doing something else. So when does a “convenient” food become a UPF?
Helen Grist
Honeybourne, Worcestershire

Doesn’t the article show that it all comes down to cost? Most of what I show you is Waitrose or expensive high end food. It’s one thing to pay £1.15 for a 40g bag of Tyrell’s crisps when a 22 pack of 25g Sainsbury’s crisps costs £3.65. The article I should have written will show how people on a budget can afford to eat healthy. Why does the food industry put a premium on healthy products? Pay or die is the question.
Niklas Grundstrom
East Preston, West Sussex
Do you have an opinion about something you read in the Guardian today? Please email there your letter and will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *